I’m choosing now to talk about broadcasters’ Public Files. Why? It’s renewal year for radio stations. Some are already way down the path to another eight year cycle. Others are busy trying to figure out the rules, some calling me to ask, “Now when do I run the renewal announcements?”
I’m not a lawyer. I don’t even play one on TV…and I don’t give legal advice. However, the programming, operations and tech sides of the business are closely intertwined with the legal world.
Let me say, first off, that broadcasting is the only business where companies have to help their competition. They even have to help their detractors put them out of business. What? C’mon. If you’re with a broadcast entity, you know the drill. If you’re not, check out the FCC’s publication, The Public and Broadcasting.
Everything you need to know – including how to find a “petition to deny” the renewal application of a station. Anyone can do it. Pick a station. Go in and ask to see the public file. Everyone has a right…you don’t have to identify yourself and you don’t need a reason. The station even has to make copies for you at a reasonable price. The public file has to contain all of the following (links are to the section of the publication that references the topic):
- The License
- Applications and Related Materials
- Citizen Agreements
- Contour Maps
- Material Relating to an FCC Investigation or Complaint
- Ownership Reports and Related Material
- List of Contracts Required to be Filed with the FCC
- Political File
- EEO Materials
- “The Public and Broadcasting”
- Letters and E-Mails from the Public
- Quarterly Programming Reports
- Children's Television Programming Reports
- Records Regarding Children's Programming Commercial Limits
- Time Brokerage Agreements
- Lists of Donors
- Local Public Notice Announcements
- Must-Carry or Retransmission Consent Election
- DTV Transition Consumer Education Activity Reports
If you find any of the “folders” empty or lacking, you can go after the station for remediation – from fixing the problem to additional programming all the way to denial of a station’s license.
For many stations, the files coast quietly in a drawer somewhere, heavily guarded by the receptionist or possibly by the local librarian (under some conditions the files may be kept off site). Seldom does someone ask to see them. They’re most often checked by FCC field inspectors. In fact, violations are a major source of revenue for the commission. Many times the violations are for inaccessibility rather than lack of content. Witness this FCC Notice of Apparent Liability. (If you stop reading here, at least get a cup of coffee and click the preceding link. It’s great reading!)
Here are a couple more courtesy of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, with whom my company has NO relationship:
So, at license renewal time, the public file becomes extremely important. And right about now, stations are scrambling to make sure everything’s in order – quarterly issues and programming reports, EEO materials, even the filing of records that you aired announcements telling people that they have the right to come see the records!
It becomes a little panicky and you see a lot of jumpy and tense station management and employees. In fact, walking into a radio station in the next couple of months and asking to see the public file is a sure way to send a GM to a cardiac specialist.
The public file is definitely integral in the license renewal process, both TV and radio. Beyond that, there are other elements related to renewal – they deal with whether the station is actually compliant with all the rules. Here are a few that are often found “out of tolerance” by inspectors:
Tower location! You have to be kidding, right? Nope. I’ve taken the trusty GPS to more than one station and found the actual location off by more than a few seconds. Yes, even being on the east pylon on Chicago’s Sears/Willis Tower is different from being on the west pylon. Time to file for a minor change.
Power. C’mon. If you’re licensed 10kw, run 10kw. If you do the math on 10.6kw, which is out of tolerance, you’ll see the increased coverage is almost immeasurable. If you’re running 20kw and licensed for 10, hey, you’re probably really interfering with another station.
Pattern. If you’re a directional AM, check the monitoring points.
EAS. With all the brouhaha about EAS in the past year, if a station’s system isn’t working at this point, they deserve the fines
Logs. Is there a designated chief operator and assistant? Is he/she reviewing the logs?
Tower lights. Duh.
Station ID’s. Again, we’re not lawyers here. But remember this: Call Letters & Location. That’s the legal ID. Not call letters then “Boise’s home for sports” then location. Check the rules or call your lawyer. Oh yeah – if you’re WXXX-FM, don’t ID WXXX!
If you’re having technical problems, more than likely you can file for an STA (special temporary authorization). Do it. It keeps you legal. You can operate “at variance” with the license till you get the problem fixed…and it’s legal. If someone checks the file – including an inspector – you’re legal.
Now a couple of parting comments about the public file: The whole idea of “…public interest, convenience and necessity…” in the broadcast licensing process is based on the scarcity of frequencies/channels available in the radio spectrum. Even though there are thousands of media outlets now, it’s still true that not everyone can have their own radio or television broadcast station.
Some pirates seem to think otherwise but, in fact, it’s physically impossible. As a consequence, a broadcaster does have some level of obligation to the rest of us who have abdicated our claim to any frequencies in order for them to be able to operate their station(s). Some may say that just playing music that listeners want is enough. The Nicholas Johnsons of the world will demand that entire dayparts be devoted to needs and problems of the community.
The public file does force stations to select some issues to deal with. It makes them think about what’s out there beyond the audio console and video switcher. In that respect, it’s a reasonable idea. Are there better approaches? Absolutely. Competition can go a long way. Stations which identify major problems in a community often lead other station to cover the same story or to do some level of investigative reporting on other topics.
Linked coverage, stations covering a topic superficially then carrying it over to an HD2 channel or to web pages or streams provide significant coverage while, at the same time, retaining their main channel for more general programming. Viewers can even sign up for RSS feeds on selected topics.
And about the file, itself: The FCC is considering requiring all stations to publish the public file online. It would allow anyone and everyone to access it via the web. I don’t see the problem. Sure, everyone can see it. So what? And there’s an upside. Scan an item and stuff it into an online file and it’s there. Barring crashes, it doesn’t get lost. There’s a log file that will tell everyone when the item was posted. Look, if the rule is there, compliance is mandatory. If there’s some set of steps or a procedure that helps you do that, what the heck. As for everyone seeing it? Let ‘em look. Give a staff member “ownership” of it and challenge them to shine.*
One last time, let me say that if you’re a station operator and you have legal questions, call a (your) communications lawyer. Call your tech consultants to get you “legal” on the operating side. One more thing: File on time. And, if you haven’t read Red Quinlan’s The Hundred Million Dollar Lunch, why not?
*While they’re shining – or not – remember that regardless who you give ownership to, it’s the station's ownership who is responsible as far as the FCC is concerned.
Wrong. The public file is so out of date. The FCC needs to get with it.
ReplyDelete